data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/80d8b/80d8b1b4f56cbf6ee292983ad54f58dd70462e1e" alt=""
The
April 2009 issue of
Patent World (Informa, published ten times a year), carries
this article by Taylor Wessing litigators Gareth Morgan and Richard Price, "Providing UK patent litigants with a real alternative". This article calls for a radical overhaul of the Patents County Court and also responds in detail to some of the suggestions made by Michael Burdon in his December 2008 article (
here).
This exchange of views is unlikely to be the end of the discussion as to what form a revised patent litigation forum might take. Further developments are keenly awaited.
PatLit would like to thank
Patent World for kindly agreeing to make these articles available to its readers.
1 comment:
Interesting stuff. I am grateful to that it has been put on the web.
My understanding of the Burdon plan is that a party entitled to recover (say) 25% of its costs would recover only £25,000 not 25% of its actual cost (which could be vast) capped at £100,000. That makes excellent sense and does not encourage parties to spend unnecessarily.
If I am right about that, I think the authors have misunderstood Michael Burdon slightly.
Post a Comment