One thing
that makes our life difficult is that innovations tend to make things better –
but not in every respect. Cost-saving improvements might be less robust and “cool”
designs might be less prestigious, not to speak of the advantages and drawbacks of atomic energy or genetic engineering.
This ambivalent nature of innovations might be
one of the reasons why the requirement that the invention is a “technical
progress” has been banned from the list of requirements to be fulfilled by
patentable inventions in Germany as of 1978.
Ever since,
courts and offices struggle with the assessment of inventiveness for alleged
inventions making things – at least in important aspects - worse than before. While
the case law of the Technical Boards of Appeal still provides a special
treatment for so-called “disadvantageous modifications” (see e.g. T119/89) in that they are basically non-inventive right away as long as the disadvantages are foreseeable and not outbalanced by surprising advantages, the
BGH in Germany has banned any such judgmental considerations from the
assessment of inventive step.
Rather, the
“incentive” (Anregung) for the skilled person to modify the prior art has been
implemented in the last years as a very strict requirement for the assessment
of obviousness (see e.g. here and here).
In the
decision “Kniehebelklemmvorrichtung”,
the BGH applies this approach to a modification which ultimately turned out to
have major drawbacks, the drawbacks being – according to the patentee - an
incentive for the skilled person to return to the prior art or to make further modifications
rather than adhering to the solution according to the patent.
The
patentee’s argument that adhering to the disadvantageous solution of the
patent would therefore be non-obvious was rejected. The BGH emphasizes that the
decisive question is whether or not there was an incentive or pointer to make
the modification.
To put it
differently: As long as there is a pointer at the beginning of the street, it
is obvious to follow it – even if it ultimately turns out to be a dead-end street.
No comments:
Post a Comment